From: Bill Steidtmann
In previous articles I connected Billy Graham’s first crusade on 9-13 in 1947 to Romans 9:13, “As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” That crusade ended on 9-21, and if we continue reading through to Romans 9:21 we see the sovereign choice concept developed further.
Romans 9:15, 18, 21: “For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion … Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth … Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?”
God makes the decision to choose Jacob but not Esau and informs their prenatal mother just as God chooses who will believe before they’re born.
Ephesians 1:4-5: “According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will …”
We could say that God is “pro-choice” in choosing Jacob but not Esau and God’s choice in Ephesians 1:4-5 is the pre-planned parenthood of the adoption of children into Jesus Christ, whereas Billy Graham is “pro-choice” in that he teaches the error that Man makes the choice whether to be born again, and that Graham’s harvest of those who believe in their self-birthing decision instead of believing in Christ, like an abortion, gives birth to nothing because Esau loses access to his birthright in Genesis 27 and the unchosen vessels of dishonor are to be destroyed.
Romans 9:22: “What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction …”
Nevertheless Billy Graham did plant a “pro-choice” seed, and it did give birth to something, so if the end of his first crusade on 9-21 of 1947 aligns with Romans 9:21, what happened the next day that aligns with the lost birthright vessels in Romans 9:22?
From Wikipedia, Norma McCorvey, “[born] September 22, 1947–[died] February 18, 2017 … better known by the legal pseudonym “Jane Roe,” was the plaintiff in the landmark American lawsuit Roe v. Wade in 1973. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that individual state laws banning abortion are unconstitutional.”
From “Dictionary of American Family Names,” “McCorvey, Scottish (Kintyre): Anglicized form of Gaelic Mac Fhearghaidh ‘son of Fearghaidh,’ a pet form of the personal name Fergus.”
Ibid, Fergus: “Irish: reduced Anglicized form of Gaelic O Fearghuis or O Fearghasa ‘descendant of Fearghus,’ a personal name composed of the elements fear ‘man’ + gus ‘vigor,’ ‘force,’ or possibly ‘choice.’”
From Wikipedia, Fergus (name), “… meaning the angry (one) or the wrathful (one).”
Putting all that together “McCorvey” means “Son of Man-force/Man-choice,” or “Son of the Angry/Wrathful [one]” – exactly the point made in Romans 9:22, that the pro-Man-choice spiritual Esaus, who chose themselves for salvation but God didn’t, are vessels of wrath fitted to destruction and will be aborted. Norma McCorvey consequently died on February 18, 2017, because if January rolls over to be the 13th month, and again as 25, then February is the 26th month – therefore Decision Theology’s baby Jane died on 26-18.
Isaiah 26:17-18: “Like as a woman with child, that draweth near the time of her delivery, is in pain, and crieth out in her pangs; so have we been in thy sight, O Lord. (26:18) We have been with child, we have been in pain, we have as it were brought forth wind; we have not wrought any deliverance in the earth; neither have the inhabitants of the world fallen.”